{"id":382,"date":"2008-11-15T22:56:53","date_gmt":"2008-11-15T20:56:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/?p=382"},"modified":"2016-10-20T14:14:36","modified_gmt":"2016-10-20T12:14:36","slug":"volby-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/382\/volby-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"Volby 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>V ned\u011bli 9. listopadu 2008 prob\u011bhly v spole\u010densk\u00e9 m\u00edstnosti \u017dO Olomouc volby do \u010dty\u0159 org\u00e1n\u016f. Bylo zvoleno 5 \u010dlen\u016f P\u0159edstavenstva \u017didovsk\u00e9 obce (v po\u0159ad\u00ed podle po\u010dtu hlas\u016f: Petr Papou\u0161ek, Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hrbek, Boris Pau\u010dek, Jana \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nov\u00e1 a Pavel Deutsch), 3 \u010dlenov\u00e9 Revizn\u00ed komise (Helena Vostr\u00e1, Vasil Sadocha – oba se stejn\u00fdm po\u010dtem hlas\u016f – a Hedvika \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nov\u00e1). Do Rady Federace \u017eidovsk\u00fdch obc\u00ed byli zvoleni Petr Papou\u0161ek a Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hrbek a do Revizn\u00ed komise Rady Federace \u017eidovsk\u00fdch obc\u00ed byl s nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm dosa\u017een\u00fdm po\u010dtem hlas\u016f zvolen jedin\u00fd kandid\u00e1t Lubom\u00edr Sm\u011bl\u00fd.<\/p>\n

P\u0159edseda volebn\u00ed komise Pavel Repper ozn\u00e1mil t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed vydr\u017eeli v\u00edce ne\u017e hodinov\u00e9 s\u010d\u00edt\u00e1n\u00ed hlas\u016f dal\u0161\u00ed \u00fadaje. Podle mand\u00e1tov\u00e9 komise bylo v okam\u017eiku voleb p\u0159\u00edtomno 36 \u010dlen\u016f obce s\u00a0volebn\u00edm pr\u00e1vem a\u00a03 host\u00e9, jejich\u017e p\u0159\u00edtomnost volebn\u00ed shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed hlasov\u00e1n\u00edm schv\u00e1lilo. Z p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch \u010dlen\u016f vyu\u017eilo pr\u00e1va volit p\u0159\u00edmo 26 \u010dlen\u016f.\u00a065 \u010dlen\u016f volilo koresponden\u010dn\u00ed formou. Celkem\u00a0tedy volilo 91 \u010dlen\u016f, co\u017e je 69\u00b0% v\u0161ech \u010dlen\u016f obce. Odstupuj\u00edc\u00ed p\u0159edseda Petr Papou\u0161ek ozna\u010dil volebn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dast za v\u00fdbornou, daleko p\u0159esahuj\u00edc\u00ed z\u00e1jem o minul\u00e9 volby.<\/p>\n

P\u0159edseda volebn\u00ed komise rovn\u011b\u017e sezn\u00e1mil p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00e9 s dopisem Vasila Sadochy, j\u00edm\u017e\u00a0sd\u011bloval svou rezignaci na \u00fa\u010dast v Revizn\u00ed komisi \u017dO. Po diskusi a uji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, \u017ee proti jeho nominaci, ani zvolen\u00ed nejsou n\u00e1mitky, vzal svou rezignaci zp\u011bt.<\/p>\n

Bezprost\u0159edn\u011b pot\u00e9 n\u00e1sledovala ustavuj\u00edc\u00ed sch\u016fze\u00a0 nov\u00e9 Revizn\u00ed komise \u017dO a nov\u00e9ho P\u0159edstavenstva \u017dO. Revizn\u00ed komise zvolila za p\u0159edsedu Vasila Sadochu, P\u0159edstavenstvo se shodlo na osob\u011b Petra Papou\u0161ka. P\u0159edstavenstvo, jeho\u017e jedn\u00e1n\u00ed se z\u00fa\u010dastnil tak\u00e9 viriln\u00ed \u010dlen Zigmund Deutsch,\u00a0projednalo rovn\u011b\u017e kulo\u00e1rov\u00e9 n\u00e1mitky proti zp\u016fsobu koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby, kter\u00e9 souvisely s uveden\u00edm jm\u00e9na volitele a jeho roku narozen\u00ed na ob\u00e1lce s vypln\u011b\u00fdm volebn\u00edm l\u00edstkem. Pavel Repper vysv\u011btlil mechanismus otev\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed ob\u00e1lek, kter\u00fd vylu\u010doval, \u017ee by \u010dlenov\u00e9 volebn\u00ed komise mohli v\u011bd\u011bt, jak kdo volil. Byl po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1n, aby vysv\u011btlen\u00ed podal na nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00edm setk\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlen\u016f \u017dO.<\/p>\n

– th-<\/p>\n

N\u011bkolik pozn\u00e1mek k volb\u00e1m<\/h5>\n

P. Repper<\/p>\n

M\u00e1me za sebou volby do org\u00e1n\u016f na\u0161\u00ed obce i federace. Vyzna\u010dovaly se neb\u00fdvale vysokou, t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 sedmdes\u00e1tiprocentn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dast\u00ed, sv\u011bd\u010d\u00edc\u00ed o spont\u00e1nn\u00edm z\u00e1jmu \u010dlen\u016f o svou konsolidovanou a prosperuj\u00edc\u00ed obec. Byly to volby dobr\u00e9 a vpravd\u011b demokratick\u00e9. Zvolen\u00ed p\u0159edstavitel\u00e9 mohou m\u00edt dobr\u00fd pocit z v\u00fdrazn\u00e9ho vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed d\u016fv\u011bry.<\/p>\n

Voli\u010di pochopiteln\u011b nem\u011bli zapot\u0159eb\u00ed podrobn\u011b studovat volebn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d. Mo\u017en\u00e1, \u017ee n\u011bkomu nen\u00ed \u00fapln\u011b jasn\u00e9, jak byla zaji\u0161t\u011bna anonymita tajn\u00fdch voleb, zejm\u00e9na v souvislosti s uv\u00e1d\u011bn\u00edm zp\u00e1te\u010dn\u00edch adres na ob\u00e1lk\u00e1ch koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby. Pokou\u0161\u00edm se proto t\u011bmito \u0159\u00e1dky stru\u010dn\u011b popsat postup vyhodnocen\u00ed.<\/p>\n

V prv\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1m, \u017ee volebn\u00ed komise nem\u011bla v\u016fbec nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho se sestaven\u00edm kandid\u00e1tek. V jej\u00ed odpov\u011bdnosti bylo pouze, aby bylo zaji\u0161t\u011bno bezpe\u010dn\u00e9 uchov\u00e1n\u00ed do\u0161l\u00fdch koresponden\u010dn\u00edch hlas\u016f do dne voleb.<\/p>\n

Kandid\u00e1tn\u00ed listinu sestavila mand\u00e1tov\u00e1 komise podle do\u0161l\u00fdch p\u0159ihl\u00e1\u0161ek.<\/p>\n

Volebn\u00ed komise p\u0159evzala realizaci volebn\u00edho procesu a\u017e v okam\u017eiku schv\u00e1len\u00ed jej\u00edho slo\u017een\u00ed volebn\u00edm Shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00edm. Ka\u017ed\u00fd \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk voleb byl ov\u011b\u0159en podle seznamu voli\u010d\u016f a byla mu ozna\u010dena jeho kandid\u00e1tn\u00ed listina, aby se vylou\u010dilo p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9 dvoj\u00ed volen\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Po ukon\u010den\u00ed osobn\u00edch voleb byla zkontrolov\u00e1na platnost kandid\u00e1tn\u00edch listin z volebn\u00ed urny. Pak bylo ov\u011b\u0159eno, zda zp\u00e1te\u010dn\u00ed adresy koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby odpov\u00eddaj\u00ed seznamu voli\u010d\u016f. N\u00e1sledovalo otev\u0159en\u00ed ob\u00e1lek koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby a odstran\u011bn\u00ed ob\u00e1lek.<\/p>\n

Kandid\u00e1tn\u00ed listiny koresponden\u010dn\u00ed volby byly v st\u00e1le zalepen\u00e9m stavu ozna\u010deny raz\u00edtkem a podpisem stejn\u011b jako u osobn\u00ed volby a pak p\u0159id\u00e1ny ke kandid\u00e1tn\u00edm listin\u00e1m z volebn\u00ed urny.<\/p>\n

Potom u\u017e n\u00e1sledovalo otev\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed a rozlepov\u00e1n\u00ed kandid\u00e1tn\u00edch listin a s\u010d\u00edt\u00e1n\u00ed hlas\u016f pro jednotliv\u00e9 kandid\u00e1ty. V kone\u010dn\u00e9 f\u00e1zi pak volebn\u00ed komise sestavila po\u0159adn\u00edk podle po\u010dtu z\u00edskan\u00fdch hlas\u016f a t\u00edm i stanovila slo\u017een\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch zvolen\u00fdch org\u00e1n\u016f.<\/p>\n

Tento kone\u010dn\u00fd v\u00fdsledek byl pak neprodlen\u011b ozn\u00e1men volebn\u00edmu Shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Volebn\u00ed komise pracovala pochopiteln\u011b v samostatn\u00e9 m\u00edstnosti, p\u0159itom ale ka\u017ed\u00fd \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk volebn\u00edho Shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed mohl kdykoliv vstoupit a pr\u00e1ci komise sledovat, co\u017e se i d\u011blo.<\/p>\n

Snad jsem t\u00edmto popisem cel\u00e9 procedury ujistil v\u0161echny na\u0161e \u010dleny, \u017ee vyhodnocen\u00ed voleb prob\u011bhlo korektn\u011b a \u017ee striktn\u011b p\u0159edepsan\u00fd postup vylu\u010doval jakoukoliv mo\u017enost p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9ho naru\u0161en\u00ed tajnosti voleb.<\/p>\n

Velk\u00fd po\u010det dodan\u00fdch hlas\u016f, zejm\u00e9na pak koresponden\u010dn\u00edch, zp\u016fsobil, \u017ee volebn\u00ed komise m\u011bla ne\u010dekan\u011b plno pr\u00e1ce. V\u0161ichni se sna\u017eili p\u0159i p\u0159esn\u00e9m dodr\u017een\u00ed postupu odv\u00e9st svou \u010dinnost v optim\u00e1ln\u011b mo\u017en\u00e9 dob\u011b. P\u0159esto n\u00e1m to trvalo snad dobr\u00e9 dv\u011b hodiny. D\u011bkuji velmi za soust\u0159ed\u011bnou a klidnou pr\u00e1ci p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm pan\u00ed Ev\u011b Skl\u00e1dalov\u00e9 a t\u00e9\u017e Pavlu Barto\u0161ovi, kter\u00fd jak v\u00edme, musel soub\u011b\u017en\u011b plnit je\u0161t\u011b dal\u0161\u00ed sv\u00e9 pracovn\u00ed \u00fakoly.\u00a0 M\u00e9 d\u00edky pat\u0159\u00ed i v\u0161em \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk\u016fm volebn\u00edho Shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed tvo\u0159ili sympatickou spole\u010dnost, jednaj\u00edc\u00ed a rozhoduj\u00edc\u00ed s rozvahou a citem a projevili pot\u0159ebnou trp\u011blivost.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

V ned\u011bli 9. listopadu 2008 prob\u011bhly v spole\u010densk\u00e9 m\u00edstnosti \u017dO Olomouc volby do \u010dty\u0159 org\u00e1n\u016f. Bylo zvoleno 5 \u010dlen\u016f P\u0159edstavenstva \u017didovsk\u00e9 obce (v po\u0159ad\u00ed podle po\u010dtu hlas\u016f: Petr Papou\u0161ek, Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hrbek, Boris Pau\u010dek, Jana \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nov\u00e1 a Pavel Deutsch), 3 \u010dlenov\u00e9 Revizn\u00ed komise (Helena Vostr\u00e1, Vasil Sadocha – oba se stejn\u00fdm po\u010dtem hlas\u016f – a Hedvika \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nov\u00e1). Do Rady Federace \u017eidovsk\u00fdch obc\u00ed byli zvoleni Petr Papou\u0161ek a Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hrbek a do Revizn\u00ed komise Rady Federace \u017eidovsk\u00fdch obc\u00ed byl s nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm dosa\u017een\u00fdm po\u010dtem hlas\u016f zvolen jedin\u00fd kandid\u00e1t Lubom\u00edr Sm\u011bl\u00fd.
\nP\u0159edseda volebn\u00ed komise Pavel …<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[27,26,10],"class_list":["post-382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-headline","tag-federace","tag-predstavenstvo","tag-volby"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382"}],"version-history":[{"count":43,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8663,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions\/8663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kehila-olomouc.cz\/rs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}